Seauto SAT20 Pro vs Seauto SAT 25

Last updated: October 22, 2026

The Seauto SAT20 Pro and the Seauto SAT 25 are evenly matched, rated 4.0 and 4.0. The Seauto SAT20 Pro costs $10 less ($259.99 vs $269.99).

Seauto SAT20 Pro vs Seauto SAT 25

Seauto SAT 25

A low-cost, sonar-guided cordless robot for in-ground and above-ground pools up to about 2,150 sq ft that need floor, wall and waterline cleaning. Pools with fine silt, raised drains or sharp steps need a different robot.

Amazon $269.99
$269.99

Prices were last checked October 22, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every cordless robotic pool cleaner; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightSeauto SAT20 ProSeauto SAT 25
Overall rating4.0/54.0/5
Value 25%98 $26097 $270
Cleaning 25%85 Floor, walls and waterline85 Floor, walls and waterline
Navigation 15%75 Ultrasonic75 Ultrasonic
Warranty 15%0 1-year warranty0 1-year warranty
Pool size 10%100 pools up to 2,150 sq ft100 pools up to 2,150 sq ft
Features 10%50 too few features published (neutral score used)50 too few features published (neutral score used)

Specifications

Seauto SAT20 ProSeauto SAT 25
Pool
Pool size (rated)Up to 2,150 sq ft (200 m²)Up to 2,150 sq ft (200 m²)
Pool typesIn-groundIn-ground and above-ground
SurfacesTile, concrete, vinyl, fiberglassTile, concrete, vinyl
Max depth16.4 ft9.8 ft
Cleaning
CleansFloor, walls and waterlineFloor, walls and waterline
Surface skimmingNoNo
Filter250 µm fine filter basket300 µm filter basket
Filter capacity2.5 L-
Water flow4,800 gal/h5,500 gal/h
Power
PowerCordless (battery)Cordless (battery)
Battery7,800 mAh7,800 mAh
Run timeUp to 3 hUp to 3 h
Charge time3 h4 h
ChargingCableCable
Navigation & app
NavigationUltrasonicUltrasonic
AppNo-
Caddy included-No
Build
Water resistanceIPX8IPX8
Weight13.2 lb (6 kg)14.3 lb (6.5 kg)
Warranty1 year1 year

All robotic pool cleaner comparisons →