EVIQO EVIPOWER 40A Plug-In vs Grizzl-E Duo Connect 40A

Last updated: October 22, 2026

The EVIQO EVIPOWER 40A Plug-In is the better level 2 EV charger overall, rated 4.2 to 3.4. The EVIQO EVIPOWER 40A Plug-In leads on value and ENERGY STAR. The Grizzl-E Duo Connect 40A wins on smart features. The EVIQO EVIPOWER 40A Plug-In costs $450 less ($449.99 vs $899.99).

EVIQO EVIPOWER 40A Plug-In vs Grizzl-E Duo Connect 40A

Prices were last checked October 22, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every up to 40 A level 2 EV charger; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightEVIQO EVIPOWER 40A Plug-InGrizzl-E Duo Connect 40A
Overall rating4.2/53.4/5
Value 30%60 $449.990 $899.99
Safety listing 15%100 listed: UL/ETL certified (standard not named)100 listed: UL certified (UL file E510712)
Smart features 15%70 app control, off-peak scheduling100 app control, off-peak scheduling, load sharing
ENERGY STAR 10%100 ENERGY STAR certified0 not ENERGY STAR certified
Weather rating 10%100 NEMA 4: rain, hose spray and dust100 NEMA 4: rain, hose spray and dust
Cable 10%100 25 ft cable100 25 ft cable
Warranty 10%50 3-year warranty50 3-year warranty

Specifications

EVIQO EVIPOWER 40A Plug-InGrizzl-E Duo Connect 40A
Charging
Maximum power40 A (9.6 kW)40 A (9.6 kW)
Adjustable currentYesYes
Vehicle plugJ1772 or Tesla (NACS)J1772 or Tesla (NACS)
Cable length25 ft25 ft
InstallationPlug-in (NEMA 14-50)Plug-in or hardwired (NEMA 14-50)
Smart features
Wi-FiYesYes
AppYesYes
Off-peak schedulingYesYes
Load sharingNoYes
OCPP (third-party networks)NoYes
Safety and build
Safety listingUL/ETL certified (standard not named)UL certified (UL file E510712)
ENERGY STARYesNo
Weather ratingNEMA 4, IP66NEMA 4
Lowest operating temperature-22 °F-22 °F
Dimensions-10.25 x 6.25 x 3.75 in
Weight-21 lb
Warranty3 years3 years

All level 2 EV charger comparisons →