Grizzl-E Classic Connect 40A vs Lectron Portable 40A Level 2

Last updated: October 22, 2026

The Grizzl-E Classic Connect 40A is the better level 2 EV charger overall, rated 4.3 to 4.0. The Grizzl-E Classic Connect 40A leads on smart features, cable and warranty. The Lectron Portable 40A Level 2 wins on ENERGY STAR and value. The Lectron Portable 40A Level 2 costs $100 less ($249.99 vs $349.99).

Grizzl-E Classic Connect 40A vs Lectron Portable 40A Level 2

Prices were last checked October 22, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every up to 40 A level 2 EV charger; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightGrizzl-E Classic Connect 40ALectron Portable 40A Level 2
Overall rating4.3/54.0/5
Value 30%80 $349.99100 $249.99
Safety listing 15%100 listed: UL certified (UL file E510712)100 listed: UL 2594 (ETL)
Smart features 15%100 app control, off-peak scheduling, load sharing0 no app or scheduling
ENERGY STAR 10%0 not ENERGY STAR certified100 ENERGY STAR certified
Weather rating 10%100 NEMA 4: rain, hose spray and dust100 IP65: rain, hose spray and dust
Cable 10%100 25 ft cable31 16 ft cable
Warranty 10%50 3-year warranty25 2-year warranty

Specifications

Grizzl-E Classic Connect 40ALectron Portable 40A Level 2
Charging
Maximum power40 A (9.6 kW)40 A (9.6 kW)
Adjustable currentYesNo
Vehicle plugJ1772 or Tesla (NACS)J1772 or Tesla (NACS)
Cable length25 ft16 ft
InstallationPlug-in or hardwired (NEMA 14-50)Plug-in (NEMA 14-50), portable
Smart features
Wi-FiYesNo
AppYesNo
Off-peak schedulingYesNo
Load sharingYesNo
OCPP (third-party networks)YesNo
Safety and build
Safety listingUL certified (UL file E510712)UL 2594 (ETL)
ENERGY STARNoYes
Weather ratingNEMA 4IP65
Lowest operating temperature-22 °F-22 °F
Dimensions10.25 x 6.25 x 3.75 in16.5 x 13 x 5 in
Weight21 lb9.9 lb
Warranty3 years2 years

All level 2 EV charger comparisons →