Victron SmartSolar MPPT 100/50 vs Victron SmartSolar MPPT 150/60-Tr

Last updated: October 22, 2026

The Victron SmartSolar MPPT 100/50 is the better charge controller overall, rated 4.4 to 4.1. The Victron SmartSolar MPPT 100/50 leads on value. The Victron SmartSolar MPPT 150/60-Tr wins on features. The Victron SmartSolar MPPT 100/50 costs $175.10 less ($193.80 vs $368.90).

Victron SmartSolar MPPT 100/50 vs Victron SmartSolar MPPT 150/60-Tr

Prices were last checked October 22, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every MPPT solar charge controller; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightVictron SmartSolar MPPT 100/50Victron SmartSolar MPPT 150/60-Tr
Overall rating4.4/54.1/5
Value 35%82 $3.88 per amp of charge current51 $6.15 per amp of charge current
Features 25%77 Bluetooth app, lithium profile, temperature sensor; no temperature sensor90 Bluetooth app, lithium profile, temperature sensor, 150 V PV input; no temperature sensor
Efficiency 20%75 98% peak efficiency (maker rating)75 98% peak efficiency (maker rating)
Warranty 20%100 5-year warranty100 5-year warranty

Specifications

Victron SmartSolar MPPT 100/50Victron SmartSolar MPPT 150/60-Tr
Charging
TypeMPPT solar charge controllerMPPT solar charge controller
Charge current50 A60 A
Battery voltage12/24 V12/24/36/48 V
Lithium profileYesYes
Custom profileYesYes
Temperature sensorOptional extraOptional extra
Peak efficiency98%98%
Standby draw30 mA35 mA
Inputs
Max PV voltage (Voc)100 V150 V
Max PV power (12 V)700 W860 W
Monitoring and build
BluetoothBuilt inBuilt in
DisplayNoNo
Load outputNoNo
Parallel unitsYesYes
Cooling-passive (no fan)
Water resistanceIP43 (electronics), IP22 (connection area)IP43 (electronics), IP22 (connection area)
Dimensions130 x 186 x 70 mm185 x 250 x 95 mm
Weight2.9 lb6.6 lb
Warranty5 years5 years

All charge controller comparisons →