Kenmore 350 vs SoftPro Elite 32,000 Grain

Last updated: November 1, 2026

The SoftPro Elite 32,000 Grain is the better water softener overall, rated 3.2 to 3.1. The SoftPro Elite 32,000 Grain leads on warranty. The Kenmore 350 wins on value. The Kenmore 350 costs $537.71 less ($621.29 vs $1,159).

Kenmore 350 vs SoftPro Elite 32,000 Grain

Prices were last checked November 1, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every up to 32,000 grains water softener; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightSoftPro Elite 32,000 GrainKenmore 350
Overall rating3.2/53.1/5
Value 30%0 $36.22 per 1,000 grains ($1,159, 32,000 grains)55 $19.42 per 1,000 grains ($621.29, 32,000 grains)
Salt efficiency 20%50 salt efficiency not published (neutral score used)50 salt efficiency not published (neutral score used)
Flow 15%50 service flow not published (neutral score used)20 7.2 gpm service flow
Warranty 25%100 10 years on the valve, 99 years on the tanks22 3 years on the valve, 10 years on the tanks
Certification 10%50 certification not stated (neutral score used)100 certified to NSF/ANSI 44

Independent measurements

SoftPro Elite 32,000 Grain

Tested byHardness outSalt usedConditions
Water Filter Guru0 gpg-Lab test of a 32,000 grain SoftPro Elite on a private well in Milner, Colorado, after two sediment filters and a UV unit: total hardness 120 ppm (7.0 gpg) in, 0.052 ppm out (0.003 gpg). Salt use not measured.

Kenmore 350

No independent test published yet.

Specifications

SoftPro Elite 32,000 GrainKenmore 350
Capacity
Rated capacity32,000 grains32,000 grains
Service flow-7.2 gpm
Control
Valve-Kenmore demand valve
Regenerates on demandYesYes
App or remote monitoringNoNo
Bypass valve includedYes-
Certification and warranty
NSF/ANSI 44-Yes
Valve warranty10 years3 years
Tank warrantyLifetime10 years

All water softener comparisons →