Hayward Perflex EC65A vs Hayward ProGrid DE3620

Last updated: November 2, 2026

The Hayward Perflex EC65A is the better pool filter overall, rated 3.1 to 3.0. The Hayward Perflex EC65A leads on value. The Hayward ProGrid DE3620 wins on filter area. The Hayward Perflex EC65A costs $240 less ($1,149 vs $1,389).

Hayward Perflex EC65A vs Hayward ProGrid DE3620

Prices were last checked November 2, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every D.E. pool filter; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightHayward Perflex EC65AHayward ProGrid DE3620
Overall rating3.1/53.0/5
Value 35%46 $17.15 per gpm ($1,149, 67 gpm)37 $19.29 per gpm ($1,389, 72 gpm)
Filter area 30%13 27 sq ft of filter area31 36 sq ft of filter area
Valve 10%100 no backwash valve needed50 valve type not published (neutral score used)
Pressure rating 10%100 50 psi maximum working pressure100 50 psi maximum working pressure
Warranty 15%33 1-year warranty33 1-year warranty

Specifications

Hayward Perflex EC65AHayward ProGrid DE3620
Filtering
Filter typeD.E.D.E.
Filter area27 sq ft36 sq ft
Maximum flow67 gpm72 gpm
Pool typeIn-groundIn-ground
Build
ValveNone needed-
Maximum pressure50 psi50 psi
Ports1.5 in2 in
Air reliefYesYes
Warranty1 year1 year

All pool filter comparisons →