Hayward Perflex EC75A vs Hayward ProSeries S310T2

Last updated: November 2, 2026

The Hayward ProSeries S310T2 rates 3.9 among sand pool filters; the Hayward Perflex EC75A rates 3.7 among D.E. ones. The Hayward ProSeries S310T2 costs $20 less ($1,219 vs $1,239).

Hayward Perflex EC75A vs Hayward ProSeries S310T2

Prices were last checked November 2, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Scores side by side

These two sit in different type classes (sand and D.E.), and each is scored against the reference points for its own class, so a rating says how well each does among its own type peers. How we rank explains each factor.

Factor weightHayward ProSeries S310T2Hayward Perflex EC75A
Overall rating3.9/53.7/5
Value 35%39 $12.44 per gpm ($1,219, 98 gpm)73 $12.39 per gpm ($1,239, 100 gpm)
Filter area 30%97 4.9 sq ft of filter area38 40 sq ft of filter area
Valve 10%100 multiport valve100 no backwash valve needed
Pressure rating 10%100 50 psi maximum working pressure100 50 psi maximum working pressure
Warranty 15%33 1-year warranty33 1-year warranty

Specifications

Hayward ProSeries S310T2Hayward Perflex EC75A
Filtering
Filter typeSandD.E.
Filter area4.9 sq ft40 sq ft
Maximum flow98 gpm100 gpm
Largest pool47,040 gal-
Pool typeIn-groundIn-ground
Sand500 lb-
Build
ValveMultiportNone needed
Maximum pressure50 psi50 psi
Ports2 in1.5 in
Air relief-Yes
Warranty1 year1 year

All pool filter comparisons →