Morningstar TriStar MPPT 45 vs Victron SmartSolar MPPT 100/50

Last updated: October 24, 2026

The Victron SmartSolar MPPT 100/50 is the better charge controller overall, rated 4.4 to 3.2. The Victron SmartSolar MPPT 100/50 leads on value and features. The Morningstar TriStar MPPT 45 wins on efficiency. The Victron SmartSolar MPPT 100/50 costs $364.20 less ($193.80 vs $558).

Morningstar TriStar MPPT 45 vs Victron SmartSolar MPPT 100/50

Prices were last checked October 24, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every MPPT solar charge controller; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightVictron SmartSolar MPPT 100/50Morningstar TriStar MPPT 45
Overall rating4.4/53.2/5
Value 35%82 $3.88 per amp of charge current0 $12.40 per amp of charge current
Features 25%77 Bluetooth app, lithium profile, temperature sensor; no temperature sensor30 temperature sensor, 150 V PV input; no Bluetooth
Efficiency 20%75 98% peak efficiency (maker rating)100 99% peak efficiency (maker rating)
Warranty 20%100 5-year warranty100 5-year warranty

Specifications

Victron SmartSolar MPPT 100/50Morningstar TriStar MPPT 45
Charging
TypeMPPT solar charge controllerMPPT solar charge controller
Charge current50 A45 A
Battery voltage12/24 V12/24/36/48 V
Lithium profileYesNo
Custom profileYesYes
Temperature sensorOptional extraOptional extra
Peak efficiency98%99%
Standby draw30 mA225 mA
Inputs
Max PV voltage (Voc)100 V150 V
Max PV power (12 V)700 W600 W
Max PV power (48 V)-2,400 W
Monitoring and build
BluetoothBuilt inNo
DisplayNoNo
Load outputNoNo
Parallel unitsYes-
Cooling-passive (no fans)
Water resistanceIP43 (electronics), IP22 (connection area)IP20 (Type 1, indoor and vented)
Dimensions130 x 186 x 70 mm29.1 x 13.0 x 14.2 cm (11.4 x 5.1 x 5.6 in)
Weight2.9 lb9.2 lb
Warranty5 years5 years
Released2017-082009

All charge controller comparisons →