AKASO WT50 vs Kodak Luma 150

Last updated: October 29, 2026

The AKASO WT50 is the better projector overall, rated 2.3 to 2.1. The AKASO WT50 leads on streaming. The Kodak Luma 150 costs $30 less ($239.99 vs $269.99).

AKASO WT50 vs Kodak Luma 150

Higher rated
AKASO WT50

A pocket projector for travel and a dark bedroom, with its own Android apps. Its 50 lumens and 480p panel make it a novelty next to any plug-in 1080p projector at the same price.

Amazon $269.99
$269.99

Prices were last checked October 29, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every 1080p and under projector; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightAKASO WT50Kodak Luma 150
Overall rating2.3/52.1/5
Brightness 25%0 50 ANSI lumens0 60 ANSI lumens
Value 15%0 $5.40 per lumen0 $4.00 per lumen
Resolution 10%0 854 x 480 native, below 720p0 854 x 480 native, below 720p
Streaming 15%50 Android, no licensed Netflix0 no built-in apps; needs a streaming stick
Setup 10%30 Auto keystone50 setup features not stated (neutral score used)
Light life 10%50 light source life not published (neutral score used)50 light source life not published (neutral score used)
Gaming 10%50 input lag not published (neutral score used)50 input lag not published (neutral score used)
Warranty 5%50 2-year warranty50 warranty not published (neutral score used)

Specifications

AKASO WT50Kodak Luma 150
Picture
Brightness50 ANSI60 ANSI
Native resolution854 x 480854 x 480
Picture resolution854x480854x480
DisplayDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Dynamic contrast-1,000:1
Placement
ThrowShort throw (1.2:1)Standard throw
Largest image120 in150 in
AutofocusNo-
Auto keystoneYes-
Optical zoomNone-
Streaming and gaming
Built-in appsAndroidNone
Build
Battery2 hours2.5 hours
Dimensions5.71 x 3.15 x 0.79 in3.9 x 3.9 x 0.89 in
Weight0.6 lb-
Warranty2 years-
Released-2019-07

All projector comparisons →