BenQ GV50 vs Wanbo ToGo Pro

Last updated: October 29, 2026

The BenQ GV50 and the Wanbo ToGo Pro are evenly matched, rated 3.7 and 3.7. The BenQ GV50 leads on warranty. The Wanbo ToGo Pro wins on value. The Wanbo ToGo Pro costs $329.01 less ($319.99 vs $649).

BenQ GV50 vs Wanbo ToGo Pro

Prices were last checked October 29, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every 1080p and under projector; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightBenQ GV50Wanbo ToGo Pro
Overall rating3.7/53.7/5
Brightness 25%38 500 ANSI lumens38 500 ANSI lumens
Value 15%0 $1.30 per lumen42 $0.64 per lumen
Resolution 10%100 1920 x 1080 native100 1920 x 1080 native
Streaming 15%100 Google TV with licensed Netflix100 Google TV with licensed Netflix
Setup 10%60 Autofocus, auto keystone60 Autofocus, auto keystone
Light life 10%100 30,000 hour laser100 20,000 hour LED
Gaming 10%66 22.4 ms input lag50 input lag not published (neutral score used)
Warranty 5%100 3-year warranty0 1-year warranty

Specifications

BenQ GV50Wanbo ToGo Pro
Picture
Brightness500 ANSI500 ANSI
Native resolution1920 x 1080 (1080p)1920 x 1080 (1080p)
Picture resolution1080p1080p
DisplayDLPLCD
Light sourcelaserLED
Light source life30,000 hours20,000 hours
HDRHDR10, HLG-
Color gamut92% Rec.709-
Native contrast-2,500:1
Dynamic contrast100,000:1-
Placement
ThrowStandard throw (1.2:1)Standard throw (1.3:1)
Largest image120 in-
AutofocusYesYes
Auto keystoneYesYes
Obstacle avoidanceYes-
Auto screen fitYesYes
Optical zoomNoneNone
Streaming and gaming
Built-in appsGoogle TV, licensed NetflixGoogle TV, licensed Netflix
Input lag22.4 ms-
Top refresh rate60 Hz-
HDMI ports11
eARCNo-
Speakers18 W8 W
Build
Battery2.5 hours3.5 hours
Fan noise28 dB27 dB
Power85 W82 W
Dimensions5.12 x 8.31 x 7.54 in-
Weight4.6 lb5.7 lb
Warranty3 years1 years
Released2024-082026-04

All projector comparisons →