AuKing V301 Roku TV vs Epson EpiqVision Flex CO-W01

Last updated: October 29, 2026

The Epson EpiqVision Flex CO-W01 and the AuKing V301 Roku TV are evenly matched, rated 3.3 and 3.3. The Epson EpiqVision Flex CO-W01 leads on brightness. The AuKing V301 Roku TV wins on streaming, resolution and setup.

AuKing V301 Roku TV vs Epson EpiqVision Flex CO-W01

Prices were last checked October 29, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every 1080p and under projector; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightEpson EpiqVision Flex CO-W01AuKing V301 Roku TV
Overall rating3.3/53.3/5
Brightness 25%95 3,000 ISO 21118 lumens0 no ANSI or ISO brightness rating
Value 15%100 $0.11 per lumen50 no rated brightness (neutral score used)
Resolution 10%30 1280 x 800 native, below 1080p100 1920 x 1080 native
Streaming 15%0 no built-in apps; needs a streaming stick100 Roku TV with licensed Netflix
Setup 10%0 Manual focus and keystone60 Autofocus, auto keystone
Light life 10%50 12,000 hour lamp50 light source life not published (neutral score used)
Gaming 10%50 input lag not published (neutral score used)50 input lag not published (neutral score used)
Warranty 5%0 1-year warranty50 2-year warranty

Specifications

Epson EpiqVision Flex CO-W01AuKing V301 Roku TV
Picture
Brightness3,000 ISO 21118-
Native resolution1280 x 8001920 x 1080 (1080p)
Picture resolution1280x8001080p
Display3LCD-
Light sourcelamp-
Light source life12,000 hours-
Placement
ThrowStandard throw (1.3:1)Standard throw
Largest image300 in-
AutofocusNoYes
Auto keystone-Yes
Optical zoomNone-
Streaming and gaming
Built-in appsNoneRoku TV, licensed Netflix
HDMI ports1-
Speakers5 W10 W
Build
BatteryNoneNone
Fan noise38 dB32 dB
Power284 W-
Dimensions11.6 x 8.3 x 3.4 in7.32 x 6.14 x 10.12 in
Weight5.3 lb4 lb
Warranty1 years2 years
Released2022-09-27-

All projector comparisons →