Dyna-Glo HeatAround 360 HA2360R vs ThermoMate PHF18B 18,000 BTU

Last updated: October 30, 2026

The Dyna-Glo HeatAround 360 HA2360R and the ThermoMate PHF18B 18,000 BTU are evenly matched, rated 3.9 and 3.9. The Dyna-Glo HeatAround 360 HA2360R leads on value, safety and fuel options. The ThermoMate PHF18B 18,000 BTU wins on turndown. The Dyna-Glo HeatAround 360 HA2360R costs $40 less ($129.99 vs $169.99).

Dyna-Glo HeatAround 360 HA2360R vs ThermoMate PHF18B 18,000 BTU

Prices were last checked October 30, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every portable propane heater; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightDyna-Glo HeatAround 360 HA2360RThermoMate PHF18B 18,000 BTU
Overall rating3.9/53.9/5
Value 25%73 $7.22 per 1,000 BTU ($129.99, 18,000 BTU)54 $9.44 per 1,000 BTU ($169.99, 18,000 BTU)
Safety 30%100 CSA listed, low-oxygen shutoff, tip-over shutoff, flame-out shutoff90 CSA listed, low-oxygen shutoff, tip-over shutoff
Warranty 15%0 1-year warranty0 1-year warranty
Turndown 15%36 turns down to 13,500 BTU95 turns down to 6,000 BTU
Ignition 10%100 push-button piezo ignition100 push-button piezo ignition
Fuel options 5%100 runs on 1 lb cylinders or a bulk tank50 runs on a bulk tank only

Specifications

Dyna-Glo HeatAround 360 HA2360RThermoMate PHF18B 18,000 BTU
Heating
Heat output13,500 to 18,000 BTU6,000 to 18,000 BTU
TypePortablePortable
UseIndoor (ventilated)Job sites and garages
Heats up to450 sq ft450 sq ft
ThermostatNoNo
FanNoNo
Fuel and power
Fuel1 lb cylinder or bulk tankBulk tank
Hose includedNoYes
IgnitionPush-button piezoPush-button piezo
Power neededNoneNone
Safety
Safety listingCSACSA
Low-oxygen shutoffYesYes
Tip-over shutoffYesYes
Flame-out shutoffYes-
Build
Noise-32 dB
Dimensions12.2 x 12.2 x 20.35 in15 x 11.3 x 21.7 in
Weight8.8 lb14.6 lb
Warranty1 year1 year

All propane heater comparisons →