APEC RO-90 vs iSpring RCC7AK

Last updated: November 2, 2026

The APEC RO-90 is the better under-sink reverse osmosis system overall, rated 3.8 to 3.6. The APEC RO-90 leads on filter cost and output. The iSpring RCC7AK costs $10 less ($199.99 vs $209.99).

APEC RO-90 vs iSpring RCC7AK

Prices were last checked November 2, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every with tank under-sink reverse osmosis system; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightAPEC RO-90iSpring RCC7AK
Overall rating3.8/53.6/5
Certification 25%100 certified to NSF/ANSI 58100 certified to NSF/ANSI 58
Filter cost 20%77 $73 a year in replacement filters60 $95 a year in replacement filters
Water wasted 15%50 drain ratio not published (neutral score used)50 drain ratio not published (neutral score used)
Output 10%80 90 gallons a day50 75 gallons a day
Price 15%72 $209.9976 $199.99
Warranty 15%0 1-year warranty0 1-year warranty

Independent measurements

APEC RO-90

No independent test published yet.

iSpring RCC7AK

Tested byTDS reductionOutputPure to drainConditions
Water Filter Guru93 %35.3 gpd0.5 :1RCC7-AK tested without a booster pump on 635 ppm feed water: 44 ppm after 2 minutes of flow (114 ppm on first draw after 10 hours idle). 12 oz filled in 230.18 s; 64 oz of pure water sent 137 oz to drain (1:2.14). Date is the review update date.

Specifications

APEC RO-90iSpring RCC7AK
Filtration
Output90 gallons a day75 gallons a day
Stages56
RemineralizationNoYes
NSF/ANSI 58YesYes
Other certificationsNSF/ANSI 372NSF/ANSI 372
Replacement filters$73 a year$95 a year
Build
Tank4 gal3.2 gal
Booster pumpNoNo
Smart faucetNoNo
Warranty1 year1 year

All under-sink reverse osmosis system comparisons →