NOCO Boost Plus GB40 vs Schumacher SL1672

Last updated: October 30, 2026

The Schumacher SL1672 is the better jump starter overall, rated 3.8 to 3.3. The Schumacher SL1672 leads on value and warranty. The NOCO Boost Plus GB40 wins on features. The Schumacher SL1672 costs $48.66 less ($51.29 vs $99.95).

NOCO Boost Plus GB40 vs Schumacher SL1672

Prices were last checked October 30, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every cars and suvs jump starter; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightSchumacher SL1672NOCO Boost Plus GB40
Overall rating3.8/53.3/5
Value 40%90 $51.29 for its size45 $99.95 for its size
Features 35%65 manual override, USB-C charging87 manual override, rated to -22 °F, USB-C charging, IP65
Capacity 15%9 23.7 Wh battery10 24 Wh battery
Warranty 10%50 2-year warranty0 1-year warranty

Independent measurements

Schumacher SL1672

No independent test published yet.

NOCO Boost Plus GB40

Tested byCrankingPeakConditions
MJLorton216 A225 ACarbon pile load test (FJC 45118 1000 A tester), four back-to-back runs starting at 12.2 V down to 11.0 V. Highest current observed was 225 A; highest at about 7 V was 216 A (runs ranged 160 to 216 A at about 7 V). The same unit completed 16 real car starts.

Specifications

Schumacher SL1672NOCO Boost Plus GB40
Starting
Rated engines6 L gas, 3 L diesel6 L gas, 3 L diesel
Peak amps (maker)1,000 A1,000 A
Voltage12 V12 V
Manual overrideYesYes
Lowest operating temperature--22 °F
Battery and charging
ChemistryLithium-ionLithium-ion
Capacity23.7 Wh24 Wh
USB-C input15 W10.5 W
Recharge time3 hours3 hours
USB outputsUSB-C 3 A, USB-A 3 A, 10 W wireless padUSB 10 W
Build
FlashlightYesYes
Air compressorNoNo
Water resistance-IP65
Dimensions6.98 x 3.43 x 1.42 in7.72 x 3.16 x 1.71 in
Weight1.6 lb2.5 lb
Warranty2 years1 year
Released2024-092015-12

All jump starter comparisons →