A. O. Smith AOS-DFRO800 vs Waterdrop G3P800

Last updated: November 2, 2026

The Waterdrop G3P800 and the A. O. Smith AOS-DFRO800 are evenly matched, rated 3.4 and 3.3. The Waterdrop G3P800 leads on filter cost. The A. O. Smith AOS-DFRO800 wins on price and warranty. The A. O. Smith AOS-DFRO800 costs $399.01 less ($449.99 vs $849).

A. O. Smith AOS-DFRO800 vs Waterdrop G3P800

Prices were last checked November 2, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every tankless under-sink reverse osmosis system; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightWaterdrop G3P800A. O. Smith AOS-DFRO800
Overall rating3.4/53.3/5
Certification 25%100 certified to NSF/ANSI 58100 certified to NSF/ANSI 58
Filter cost 20%28 $160 a year in replacement filters0 $290 a year in replacement filters
Water wasted 15%100 3:1 pure to drain50 drain ratio not published (neutral score used)
Output 10%71 800 gallons a day71 800 gallons a day
Price 15%5 $84954 $449.99
Warranty 15%0 1-year warranty25 2-year warranty

Independent measurements

Waterdrop G3P800

Tested byTDS reductionOutputPure to drainConditions
Water Filter Guru95.5 %886.5 gpd2.2 :1Tap Score lab: 776 ppm feed to 35 ppm output without remineralization (95.49%). Flow from a 12 oz fill timed at 9.14 s (0.62 gpm) with 58.3 F feed water. Ratio from a 64 oz draw (29 oz to drain); a 12 oz draw measured 1.5:1. Date is the review update date.

A. O. Smith AOS-DFRO800

No independent test published yet.

Specifications

Waterdrop G3P800A. O. Smith AOS-DFRO800
Filtration
Output800 gallons a day800 gallons a day
Pure to drain3:1-
Stages102
RemineralizationNoNo
NSF/ANSI 58YesYes
Other certificationsNSF/ANSI 42, 53NSF/ANSI 372
Replacement filters$160 a year$290 a year
Build
TankTanklessTankless
Booster pumpYes-
Smart faucetYesNo
Warranty1 year2 years

All under-sink reverse osmosis system comparisons →