Honeywell HCE322V Digital Ceramic Tower vs Honeywell ThermaWave 6 HCE870W

Last updated: October 30, 2026

The Honeywell HCE322V Digital Ceramic Tower and the Honeywell ThermaWave 6 HCE870W are evenly matched, rated 3.3 and 3.2. The Honeywell HCE322V Digital Ceramic Tower costs $8.75 less ($82.24 vs $90.99).

Honeywell HCE322V Digital Ceramic Tower vs Honeywell ThermaWave 6 HCE870W

Prices were last checked October 30, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every fan heaters space heater; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightHoneywell HCE322V Digital Ceramic TowerHoneywell ThermaWave 6 HCE870W
Overall rating3.3/53.2/5
Value 25%37 $55 per kW ($82.24, 1,500 W)31 $61 per kW ($90.99, 1,500 W)
Safety 25%60 tip-over shutoff, overheat shutoff; no safety listing published60 tip-over shutoff, overheat shutoff; no safety listing published
Thermostat 15%100 holds a set temperature100 holds a set temperature
Warranty 15%50 3-year warranty50 3-year warranty
Controls 10%25 timer; no eco mode25 timer; no eco mode
Low setting 10%17 down to 900 W17 down to 900 W

Independent measurements

Honeywell HCE322V Digital Ceramic Tower

Tested byNoisePower drawConditions
TechGearLab46.2 dB-Noise rating in dBA from a professional sound level meter; heat setting and distance not stated.

Honeywell ThermaWave 6 HCE870W

No independent test published yet.

Specifications

Honeywell HCE322V Digital Ceramic TowerHoneywell ThermaWave 6 HCE870W
Heating
Heat settings900 to 1,500 W900 to 1,500 W
TypeFanFan
ElementCeramicCeramic
OscillatesYesNo
Controls
ThermostatDigitalDigital
Eco modeNoNo
TimerYesYes
RemoteNoNo
AppNoNo
Safety
Safety listingNone publishedNone published
Tip-over shutoffYesYes
Overheat shutoffYesYes
Cool-touch housingYesYes
Build
Dimensions8.7 x 6.7 x 21.7 in17.8 x 7.75 x 18.3 in
Weight4.4 lb11 lb
Warranty3 years3 years

All space heater comparisons →