Ashley Hearth AW1120E-P vs ComfortBilt HP22 Pellet Stove

Last updated: October 31, 2026

The ComfortBilt HP22 Pellet Stove rates 3.4 among pellet stoves stoves; the Ashley Hearth AW1120E-P rates 3.1 among wood stoves ones. The Ashley Hearth AW1120E-P costs $1,299 less ($1,000 vs $2,299).

Ashley Hearth AW1120E-P vs ComfortBilt HP22 Pellet Stove

Prices were last checked October 31, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Scores side by side

These two sit in different type classes (pellet stoves and wood stoves), and each is scored against the reference points for its own class, so a rating says how well each does among its own type peers. How we rank explains each factor.

Factor weightComfortBilt HP22 Pellet StoveAshley Hearth AW1120E-P
Overall rating3.4/53.1/5
Efficiency 30%100 81% EPA tested efficiency (HHV)30 66% EPA tested efficiency (HHV)
Value 30%17 $56.50 per 1,000 BTU of EPA tested output ($2,299, 40,689 BTU)63 $25.20 per 1,000 BTU of EPA tested output ($1,000, 39,683 BTU)
Emissions 15%61 1 g/h of smoke particles (EPA)12 2.4 g/h of smoke particles (EPA)
Warranty 10%44 5-year warranty100 limited lifetime warranty
Convenience 15%41 up to 20 hours per hopper, thermostat50 takes 18 in logs, blower optional

Specifications

ComfortBilt HP22 Pellet StoveAshley Hearth AW1120E-P
EPA certification
EPA certifiedYes (2020 standard)Yes (2020 standard)
Efficiency (HHV)81%66%
Emissions1 g/h2.4 g/h
Tested heat output12,820 to 40,689 BTU13,846 to 39,683 BTU
Heating
FuelWood pelletsCord wood
TypeFreestandingFreestanding
Advertised output40,689 BTU68,000 BTU
Heats up to2,800 sq ft1,200 sq ft
CatalyticNoNo
BlowerIncludedOptional
ThermostatYesNo
App controlNoNo
Fuel
Firebox-1.3 cu ft
Longest log-18 in
Hopper55 lb-
Burn time per hopper20 h-
Power needed120 V outletNone
Installation
Flue size3 in6 in
Mobile home approvedYesYes
Dimensions24 x 25 x 32.5 in (W x D x H)22.5 x 21.1 x 31.7 in (W x D x H)
Weight-233 lb
Warranty5 yearsLimited lifetime

All stove comparisons →