Ashley Hearth AW3200-P vs ComfortBilt HP21 Pellet Stove

Last updated: October 31, 2026

The Ashley Hearth AW3200-P rates 3.4 among wood stoves stoves; the ComfortBilt HP21 Pellet Stove rates 3.0 among pellet stoves ones. The Ashley Hearth AW3200-P costs $749.01 less ($1,199.99 vs $1,949).

Ashley Hearth AW3200-P vs ComfortBilt HP21 Pellet Stove

Prices were last checked October 31, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Scores side by side

These two sit in different type classes (wood stoves and pellet stoves), and each is scored against the reference points for its own class, so a rating says how well each does among its own type peers. How we rank explains each factor.

Factor weightAshley Hearth AW3200-PComfortBilt HP21 Pellet Stove
Overall rating3.4/53.0/5
Efficiency 30%60 72% EPA tested efficiency (HHV)80 76% EPA tested efficiency (HHV)
Value 30%33 $37.89 per 1,000 BTU of EPA tested output ($1,199.99, 31,671 BTU)10 $61.38 per 1,000 BTU of EPA tested output ($1,949, 31,753 BTU)
Emissions 15%32 1.7 g/h of smoke particles (EPA)39 1.5 g/h of smoke particles (EPA)
Warranty 10%100 limited lifetime warranty44 5-year warranty
Convenience 15%80 takes 22 in logs, blower optional36 up to 16 hours per hopper, thermostat

Specifications

Ashley Hearth AW3200-PComfortBilt HP21 Pellet Stove
EPA certification
EPA certifiedYes (2020 standard)Yes (2020 standard)
Efficiency (HHV)72%76%
Emissions1.7 g/h1.5 g/h
Tested heat output13,332 to 31,671 BTU12,349 to 31,753 BTU
Heating
FuelCord woodWood pellets
TypeFreestandingFreestanding
Advertised output152,000 BTU32,000 BTU
Heats up to3,200 sq ft2,400 sq ft
CatalyticNoNo
BlowerOptionalIncluded
ThermostatNoYes
App controlNoNo
Fuel
Firebox3.9 cu ft-
Longest log22 in-
Hopper-40 lb
Burn time per hopper-16 h
Power neededNone120 V outlet
Installation
Flue size6 in-
Mobile home approvedYesYes
Dimensions24 x 34 x 31 in (W x D x H)23.5 x 24 x 33 in (W x D x H)
Weight370 lb275 lb
WarrantyLimited lifetime5 years

All stove comparisons →