ComfortBilt HP22i Pellet Insert vs Englander Blue Ridge 150-I

Last updated: October 31, 2026

The ComfortBilt HP22i Pellet Insert is the better stove overall, rated 3.5 to 3.5. The ComfortBilt HP22i Pellet Insert leads on efficiency and emissions. The Englander Blue Ridge 150-I wins on value and convenience. The Englander Blue Ridge 150-I costs $910 less ($1,589 vs $2,499).

ComfortBilt HP22i Pellet Insert vs Englander Blue Ridge 150-I

Prices were last checked October 31, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every inserts stove; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightComfortBilt HP22i Pellet InsertEnglander Blue Ridge 150-I
Overall rating3.5/53.5/5
Efficiency 30%100 81% EPA tested efficiency (HHV)75 75% EPA tested efficiency (HHV)
Value 30%30 $61.42 per 1,000 BTU of EPA tested output ($2,499, 40,689 BTU)46 $50.13 per 1,000 BTU of EPA tested output ($1,589, 31,700 BTU)
Emissions 15%61 1 g/h of smoke particles (EPA)39 1.5 g/h of smoke particles (EPA)
Warranty 10%44 5-year warranty44 5-year warranty
Convenience 15%38 up to 18 hours per hopper, thermostat62 takes 17 in logs, blower included

Specifications

ComfortBilt HP22i Pellet InsertEnglander Blue Ridge 150-I
EPA certification
EPA certifiedYes (2020 standard)Yes (2020 standard)
Efficiency (HHV)81%75%
Emissions1 g/h1.5 g/h
Tested heat output12,820 to 40,689 BTU8,471 to 31,700 BTU
Heating
FuelWood pelletsCord wood
TypeFireplace insertFireplace insert
Advertised output40,689 BTU45,000 BTU
Heats up to2,800 sq ft1,200 sq ft
CatalyticNoNo
BlowerIncludedIncluded
ThermostatYesNo
App controlNoNo
Fuel
Firebox-1.1 cu ft
Longest log-17 in
Hopper47 lb-
Burn time per hopper18 h-
Power needed120 V outletNone
Installation
Flue size3 in6 in
Mobile home approvedYesNo
Dimensions-27.875 x 21.875 x 20.125 in (W x D x H)
Weight262 lb-
Warranty5 years5 years

All stove comparisons →