Rhino-Rack Soft Shell Roof Top Tent vs Thule Approach 2 M

Last updated: October 31, 2026

The Thule Approach 2 M is the better tent overall, rated 3.0 to 3.0. The Thule Approach 2 M leads on comfort. The Rhino-Rack Soft Shell Roof Top Tent wins on value and weight. The Rhino-Rack Soft Shell Roof Top Tent costs $1,199.96 less ($1,799.99 vs $2,999.95).

Rhino-Rack Soft Shell Roof Top Tent vs Thule Approach 2 M

Prices were last checked October 31, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every soft shell tent; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightThule Approach 2 MRhino-Rack Soft Shell Roof Top Tent
Overall rating3.0/53.0/5
Value 30%21 $89.16 per sq ft of bed ($2,999.95, 33.6 sq ft)47 $62.73 per sq ft of bed ($1,799.99, 28.7 sq ft)
Weight 20%63 128 lb for 33.6 sq ft of bed (3.8 lb per sq ft)73 99 lb for 28.7 sq ft of bed (3.5 lb per sq ft)
Weather 20%62 waterproof rating not published, 4 season50 waterproof rating not published (neutral score used)
Comfort 15%32 2.4 in mattress, anti-condensation mat not stated20 1.6 in mattress, anti-condensation mat not stated
Warranty 15%50 warranty not published (neutral score used)0 1-year warranty

Specifications

Thule Approach 2 MRhino-Rack Soft Shell Roof Top Tent
Sleeping
ShellSoft shellSoft shell
OpensFolds outFolds out
Sleeps32
Mattress51 x 95 in51.2 x 80.7 in
Bed area33.6 sq ft28.7 sq ft
Mattress thickness2.4 in1.6 in
Built-in lights-Yes
Weather
Fabric100% recycled 600D polyester ripstop600D ripstop polyoxford, PU coated (CPAI-84)
Season rating4 season-
On the vehicle
Weight128 lb99 lb
Closed size49 x 56 x 11 in49 x 53.5 x 8.3 in
Open size95 x 56 x 40 in-
Closed height11 in8.3 in
Static load660 lb-
Ladder102.4 in-
Setup time (maker)3 min-
Warranty-1 year

All tent comparisons →