BioLet 65 vs Sun-Mar Spacesaver

Last updated: October 31, 2026

The Sun-Mar Spacesaver and the BioLet 65 are evenly matched, rated 2.8 and 2.8. The Sun-Mar Spacesaver leads on value. The BioLet 65 wins on capacity. The Sun-Mar Spacesaver costs $1,035 less ($1,935 vs $2,970).

BioLet 65 vs Sun-Mar Spacesaver

Prices were last checked October 31, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every composting toilet; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightSun-Mar SpacesaverBioLet 65
Overall rating2.8/52.8/5
Value 30%48 $1,9351 $2,970
Capacity 25%0 rated for 1 person full-time60 rated for 4 people full-time
Power 15%8 35 W fan, 160 W heater50 power draw not published (neutral score used)
Certification 15%100 certified to NSF/ANSI 4150 NSF/ANSI 41 certification not stated (neutral score used)
Warranty 15%50 3-year warranty50 3-year warranty

Specifications

Sun-Mar SpacesaverBioLet 65
Capacity
TypeComposting drum or chamberComposting drum or chamber
Full-time residents1 people4 people
Urine drain optionNoNo
Agitator-Yes
Power and venting
Power120V120V
Fan35 W-
Heater160 W-
Vent size2 in2.2 in
Build
NSF/ANSI 41Yes-
Dimensions19.5 x 23 x 30 in26 x 32 x 26 in
Weight43 lb65 lb
Material-High-density composite
Warranty3 years3 years

All toilet comparisons →