Hayward H-Series H400FD vs Raypak Digital 406A

Last updated: October 31, 2026

The Raypak Digital 406A is the better gas pool heater overall, rated 3.9 to 3.5. The Raypak Digital 406A leads on warranty and value. The Hayward H-Series H400FD wins on efficiency. The Raypak Digital 406A costs $677.83 less ($4,421.17 vs $5,099).

Hayward H-Series H400FD vs Raypak Digital 406A

Prices were last checked October 31, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every 250,000 BTU and up gas pool heater; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightRaypak Digital 406AHayward H-Series H400FD
Overall rating3.9/53.5/5
Value 35%74 $11.08 per 1,000 BTU/h ($4,421.17, 399,000 BTU/h)56 $12.75 per 1,000 BTU/h ($5,099, 399,900 BTU/h)
Heating input 25%99 399,000 BTU/h100 399,900 BTU/h
Efficiency 20%33 82% thermal efficiency67 84% thermal efficiency
Warranty 20%50 2-year warranty0 1-year warranty

Specifications

Raypak Digital 406AHayward H-Series H400FD
Heating
Gas input399,000 BTU/h399,900 BTU/h
Gas typeNatural gas or propaneNatural gas or propane
Thermal efficiency82%84%
CondensingNoNo
Low NOxNoYes
Heat exchangerCopperCupro-nickel
Max water flow100 GPM125 GPM
Installation and controls
IgnitionElectronicElectronic
VentingBothBoth
Digital controlsYesYes
Automation or appYesYes
Weight-195 lb
Warranty2 years1 year

All gas pool heater comparisons →