Raypak 156A vs Sta-Rite Max-E-Therm 200

Last updated: October 31, 2026

The Sta-Rite Max-E-Therm 200 and the Raypak 156A are evenly matched, rated 3.3 and 3.3. The Sta-Rite Max-E-Therm 200 leads on heating input and efficiency. The Raypak 156A wins on warranty and value. The Raypak 156A costs $1,359.56 less ($2,290.44 vs $3,650).

Raypak 156A vs Sta-Rite Max-E-Therm 200

Prices were last checked October 31, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every under 250,000 BTU gas pool heater; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightSta-Rite Max-E-Therm 200Raypak 156A
Overall rating3.3/53.3/5
Value 35%40 $18.25 per 1,000 BTU/h ($3,650, 200,000 BTU/h)65 $15.27 per 1,000 BTU/h ($2,290.44, 150,000 BTU/h)
Heating input 25%100 200,000 BTU/h50 150,000 BTU/h
Efficiency 20%67 84% thermal efficiency33 82% thermal efficiency
Warranty 20%0 1-year warranty50 2-year warranty

Specifications

Sta-Rite Max-E-Therm 200Raypak 156A
Heating
Gas input200,000 BTU/h150,000 BTU/h
Gas typeNatural gas or propaneNatural gas or propane
Thermal efficiency84%82%
CondensingNoNo
Low NOxYesNo
Heat exchangerCopper-
Max water flow-70 GPM
Installation and controls
Ignition-Electronic
VentingBothBoth
Digital controlsYesYes
Automation or appYes-
Warranty1 year2 years

All gas pool heater comparisons →