Hayward H-Series H400FD vs Raypak Digital 336A

Last updated: October 31, 2026

The Hayward H-Series H400FD and the Raypak Digital 336A are evenly matched, rated 3.5 and 3.5. The Hayward H-Series H400FD leads on heating input and efficiency. The Raypak Digital 336A wins on warranty and value. The Raypak Digital 336A costs $1,484 less ($3,615 vs $5,099).

Hayward H-Series H400FD vs Raypak Digital 336A

Prices were last checked October 31, 2026 and are subject to change; the price and availability shown by the retailer at the time of purchase apply.

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every 250,000 BTU and up gas pool heater; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightHayward H-Series H400FDRaypak Digital 336A
Overall rating3.5/53.5/5
Value 35%56 $12.75 per 1,000 BTU/h ($5,099, 399,900 BTU/h)76 $10.89 per 1,000 BTU/h ($3,615, 332,000 BTU/h)
Heating input 25%100 399,900 BTU/h55 332,000 BTU/h
Efficiency 20%67 84% thermal efficiency33 82% thermal efficiency
Warranty 20%0 1-year warranty50 2-year warranty

Specifications

Hayward H-Series H400FDRaypak Digital 336A
Heating
Gas input399,900 BTU/h332,000 BTU/h
Gas typeNatural gas or propaneNatural gas or propane
Thermal efficiency84%82%
CondensingNoNo
Low NOxYesNo
Heat exchangerCupro-nickelCopper
Max water flow125 GPM100 GPM
Installation and controls
IgnitionElectronicElectronic
VentingBothBoth
Digital controlsYesYes
Automation or appYesYes
Weight195 lb-
Warranty1 year2 years

All gas pool heater comparisons →