Lewmar 185TT 3.0 kW Gen 2 Thruster vs Vetus BOW7512D Bow Thruster 75 kgf

Last updated: November 4, 2026

The Lewmar 185TT 3.0 kW Gen 2 Thruster is the better bow thruster overall, rated 3.6 to 3.4. The Lewmar 185TT 3.0 kW Gen 2 Thruster leads on run time and efficiency. The Vetus BOW7512D Bow Thruster 75 kgf wins on value and weight. The Vetus BOW7512D Bow Thruster 75 kgf costs $170.80 less ($2,026.32 vs $2,197.12).

Prices were last checked November 4, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Lewmar 185TT 3.0 kW Gen 2 Thruster vs Vetus BOW7512D Bow Thruster 75 kgf

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every 45 to 75 kgf bow thruster; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightLewmar 185TT 3.0 kW Gen 2 ThrusterVetus BOW7512D Bow Thruster 75 kgf
Overall rating3.6/53.4/5
Value 40%72 $37.88 per kgf ($2,197.12, 58 kgf)95 $27.02 per kgf ($2,026.32, 75 kgf)
Efficiency 25%76 19.3 kgf per kW (58 kgf, 3 kW)44 17 kgf per kW (75 kgf, 4.4 kW)
Run time 25%33 3 minutes continuous0 2 minutes continuous
Weight 10%30 2.9 kgf per kg (58 kgf, 20 kg)65 3.9 kgf per kg (75 kgf, 19 kg)

Specifications

Lewmar 185TT 3.0 kW Gen 2 ThrusterVetus BOW7512D Bow Thruster 75 kgf
Thrust
Rated thrust58 kgf75 kgf
StyleTunnelTunnel
PropellersSingleSingle
Bow or stern use-Yes
Boat length-30-45 ft
Electrical
Supply12 V12 V
Motor3 kW4.4 kW
Current draw-500 A
Continuous run3 min2 min
Build
Tunnel diameter185 mm185 mm
Weight20 kg (43 lb)19 kg

All bow thruster comparisons →