Amana 8,000 BTU Window AC vs Frigidaire Gallery 8,000 BTU Inverter

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The Frigidaire Gallery 8,000 BTU Inverter is the better air conditioner overall, rated 4.0 to 2.9. The Frigidaire Gallery 8,000 BTU Inverter leads on inverter & app and quiet. The Amana 8,000 BTU Window AC wins on value. The Amana 8,000 BTU Window AC costs $77.40 less ($289.99 vs $367.39).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Amana 8,000 BTU Window AC vs Frigidaire Gallery 8,000 BTU Inverter

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every window air conditioner; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightFrigidaire Gallery 8,000 BTU InverterAmana 8,000 BTU Window AC
Overall rating4.0/52.9/5
Value 30%62 $45.92 per 1,000 BTU (certified)80 $36.25 per 1,000 BTU (certified)
Efficiency 30%73 CEER 1550 efficiency not certified (neutral score used)
Quiet 15%100 40 dB on low (maker rating)11 56 dB on low (maker rating)
Inverter & app 15%100 inverter compressor, Wi-Fi app0 fixed-speed compressor, no app
Warranty 10%0 1-year warranty0 1-year warranty

Specifications

Frigidaire Gallery 8,000 BTU InverterAmana 8,000 BTU Window AC
Cooling
TypeWindowWindow
Certified capacity8,000 BTU8,000 BTU
Room size (maker)350 sq ft350 sq ft
Inverter compressorYesNo
HeatNoNo
Dehumidifying50.4 pints/day42.2 pints/day
Noise40 to 50 dB56 to 60 dB
Efficiency and power
CEER15 Btu/Wh-
Certified byENERGY STAR-
ENERGY STARYesNo
Power690 W661 W
Voltage115 V115 V
Current8.8 A5.8 A
RefrigerantR-32R-32
Controls and fit
Wi-Fi appYesNo
RemoteYesYes
Window width24 to 38.8 in wide-
Dimensions13.5 x 19.2 x 22.0 in13.3 x 18.6 x 17 in
Weight53.1 lb50.7 lb
Warranty1 years1 years
Released2024-10-

All air conditioner comparisons →