Antarctic Star F58145 Drawers vs Summit ADRD24 Drawers

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The Antarctic Star F58145 Drawers is the better undercounter refrigerator overall, rated 3.8 to 3.3. The Antarctic Star F58145 Drawers leads on value, installation and capacity. The Summit ADRD24 Drawers wins on warranty. The Antarctic Star F58145 Drawers costs $1,250.20 less ($727.51 vs $1,977.71).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Antarctic Star F58145 Drawers vs Summit ADRD24 Drawers

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every refrigerator drawers undercounter refrigerator; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightAntarctic Star F58145 DrawersSummit ADRD24 Drawers
Overall rating3.8/53.3/5
Value 30%80 $142.65 per cu ft ($727.51, 5.1 cu ft)21 $412.02 per cu ft ($1,977.71, 4.8 cu ft)
Capacity 15%87 5.1 cu ft77 4.8 cu ft
Installation 20%90 front venting for built-in use, rated for outdoor use70 front venting for built-in use, indoor use
Energy use 15%50 energy use not published (neutral score used)59 262 kWh a year
Noise 5%50 noise level not published (neutral score used)82 34.3 dB
Warranty 15%0 1-year warranty40 1-year warranty, 5 years on the compressor

Specifications

Antarctic Star F58145 DrawersSummit ADRD24 Drawers
Storage
Capacity5.1 cu ft4.8 cu ft
Drawers22
Temperature range32 to 50 F34 to 43 F
Defrost-Frost-free
Installation
Width22.5 in23.4 in
Height33.7 in32 in
Depth23.4 in22.8 in
Built-in (front venting)Built-inBuilt-in
Outdoor useRated for outdoorIndoor
Safety listing-ETL, ETL-S
Panel ready-Yes
Lock-No
Running
Energy use-262 kWh/yr
ENERGY STAR-Yes
Noise-34.3 dB
Build
Weight88.2 lb95 lb
Warranty1 year1 year
Compressor warranty-5 years

All undercounter refrigerator comparisons →