Atosa MBF8505GR vs Migali C-1R-HC

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The Migali C-1R-HC is the better commercial refrigerator overall, rated 3.9 to 3.8. The Migali C-1R-HC leads on value. The Migali C-1R-HC costs $183 less ($2,021 vs $2,204).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Atosa MBF8505GR vs Migali C-1R-HC

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every reach-in refrigerators commercial refrigerator; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightMigali C-1R-HCAtosa MBF8505GR
Overall rating3.9/53.8/5
Value 35%70 10.6 cu ft per $1,000 (21.4 cu ft (ENERGY STAR volume), $2,021)56 8.7 cu ft per $1,000 (19.2 cu ft (ENERGY STAR volume), $2,204)
Efficiency 20%68 1.27 kWh a day, 0.059 kWh per cu ft72 1.09 kWh a day, 0.057 kWh per cu ft
Certifications 20%100 sanitation listed, ENERGY STAR certified100 sanitation listed, ENERGY STAR certified
Warranty 25%47 2-year parts and labor, 5-year compressor47 2-year parts and labor, 5-year compressor

Specifications

Migali C-1R-HCAtosa MBF8505GR
Storage
Capacity21.4 cu ft19.2 cu ft
Capacity sourceENERGY STAR certified volumeENERGY STAR certified volume
Maker's stated capacity21.4 cu ft19.1 cu ft
Doors1 solid door1 solid door
Shelves33
Size (W × D × H)28.8 × 31.5 × 81.2 in27 × 31.7 × 83.1 in
CastersYes, 4 inYes, 4 in
Refrigeration
Temperature range33 to 41°F33 to 40°F
RefrigerantR290R290
Compressor1/7 HP1/7 HP
Compressor locationTopBottom
Electrical115/60/1115/60/1
Current2.1 A2.1 A
Energy use1.27 kWh/day1.09 kWh/day
Certifications and warranty
Sanitation listingETL Sanitation (NSF/ANSI 7)ETL Sanitation
ENERGY STARYesYes
Parts warranty2 years2 years
Labor warranty2 years2 years
Compressor warranty5 years5 years

All commercial refrigerator comparisons →