Atosa MCF8725GR vs KoolMore KM-MDR-1GD-15C

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The Atosa MCF8725GR is the better commercial refrigerator overall, rated 2.9 to 2.7. The KoolMore KM-MDR-1GD-15C wins on value. The KoolMore KM-MDR-1GD-15C costs $71.25 less ($1,527.75 vs $1,599).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Atosa MCF8725GR vs KoolMore KM-MDR-1GD-15C

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every glass-door merchandisers commercial refrigerator; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightAtosa MCF8725GRKoolMore KM-MDR-1GD-15C
Overall rating2.9/52.7/5
Value 35%24 6.9 cu ft per $1,000 (11.1 cu ft, $1,599)53 10.4 cu ft per $1,000 (15.9 cu ft, $1,527.75)
Efficiency 20%50 daily energy use not published (neutral score used)27 2.34 kWh a day, 0.147 kWh per cu ft
Certifications 20%50 sanitation listed, not ENERGY STAR certified50 sanitation listed, not ENERGY STAR certified
Warranty 25%47 2-year parts and labor, 5-year compressor0 1-year parts and labor, compressor term not published, scored as none

Specifications

Atosa MCF8725GRKoolMore KM-MDR-1GD-15C
Storage
Capacity11.1 cu ft15.9 cu ft
Capacity sourceMaker's figureMaker's figure
Maker's stated capacity11.1 cu ft15.9 cu ft
Doors1 glass door1 glass door
Shelves45
Size (W × D × H)24.2 × 24 × 76.2 in25.7 × 27.1 × 83 in
CastersYes, 2 inOptional
Refrigeration
Temperature range33 to 40°F32 to 50°F
RefrigerantR290R290
Compressor1/7 HP-
Compressor locationBottom-
Electrical115/60/1115/60/1
Current2.1 A3.5 A
Energy use-2.34 kWh/day
Certifications and warranty
Sanitation listingETL SanitationETL Sanitation
ENERGY STARNoNo
Parts warranty2 years1 year
Labor warranty2 years1 year
Compressor warranty5 years-

All commercial refrigerator comparisons →