CAMMOO 10 oz 1300 W Popcorn Machine vs Olde Midway POP-1000 10 oz Bar Style

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The CAMMOO 10 oz 1300 W Popcorn Machine is the better popcorn machine overall, rated 3.9 to 3.5. The CAMMOO 10 oz 1300 W Popcorn Machine leads on heating power and value. The CAMMOO 10 oz 1300 W Popcorn Machine costs $60 less ($139.99 vs $199.99).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

CAMMOO 10 oz 1300 W Popcorn Machine vs Olde Midway POP-1000 10 oz Bar Style

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every 8 to 10 oz popcorn machine; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightCAMMOO 10 oz 1300 W Popcorn MachineOlde Midway POP-1000 10 oz Bar Style
Overall rating3.9/53.5/5
Value 30%100 $14 per oz of kettle ($139.99, 10 oz)83 $20 per oz of kettle ($199.99, 10 oz)
Kettle size 20%75 10 oz kettle75 10 oz kettle
Heating power 10%73 130 W per oz of kettle (1,300 W, 10 oz)13 85 W per oz of kettle (850 W, 10 oz)
Features 20%75 heated deck, unpopped kernel tray, separate kettle, stirrer and light switches, cabinet light75 heated deck, unpopped kernel tray, separate kettle, stirrer and light switches, cabinet light
Listing 10%0 no listing published, scored as none0 no listing published, scored as none
Warranty 10%0 warranty not published, scored as none0 warranty not published, scored as none

Specifications

CAMMOO 10 oz 1300 W Popcorn MachineOlde Midway POP-1000 10 oz Bar Style
Popping
Kettle size10 oz10 oz
Kettle materialStainless steelStainless steel
Rated power1,300 W850 W
Price per oz of kettle$14$20
Features
TypeCountertopCountertop
Heated deckYesYes
Unpopped kernel trayYesYes
Control switches43
Cabinet lightYesYes
Cart includedNoNo
Build
Weight24 lb-

All popcorn machine comparisons →