CBM 18 ft Baker Rolling Tower Package vs CBM A2-20 Aluminum Utility Tower 20 ft

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The CBM 18 ft Baker Rolling Tower Package is the better rolling scaffold overall, rated 3.3 to 2.6. The CBM 18 ft Baker Rolling Tower Package leads on features and value. The CBM A2-20 Aluminum Utility Tower 20 ft wins on platform height. The CBM 18 ft Baker Rolling Tower Package costs $4,920.86 less ($2,299.99 vs $7,220.85).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

CBM 18 ft Baker Rolling Tower Package vs CBM A2-20 Aluminum Utility Tower 20 ft

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every 10 ft and up rolling scaffold; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightCBM 18 ft Baker Rolling Tower PackageCBM A2-20 Aluminum Utility Tower 20 ft
Overall rating3.3/52.6/5
Value 30%26 $127.78 per ft of platform height, $230 per 100 lb12 $335.85 per ft of platform height
Platform height 15%89 216 in (18 ft) platform100 258 in (21.5 ft) platform
Capacity 20%86 1,000 lb capacity50 capacity not published (neutral score used)
Features 25%55 guardrail included, outriggers included, hatch or trapdoor deck10 hatch or trapdoor deck
Warranty 10%0 warranty not published, scored as none0 warranty not published, scored as none

Specifications

CBM 18 ft Baker Rolling Tower PackageCBM A2-20 Aluminum Utility Tower 20 ft
Reach
TypeBaker scaffoldRolling tower
Platform height216 in (18 ft)258 in (21.5 ft)
Lowest platform setting-244 in
Platform size-48 x 96 in
Units that can be stacked3-
Load
Capacity1,000 lb-
How the maker states it1,000 lb gross capacity for the tower system-
Features
GuardrailIncluded-
OutriggersIncluded-
Hatch or trapdoorYesYes
Build
Weight535 lb-

All rolling scaffold comparisons →