Cudy GS1028PS2 28-Port Smart PoE+ vs TP-Link TL-SG1428PE 24-Port Smart PoE+

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The Cudy GS1028PS2 28-Port Smart PoE+ is the better poe switch overall, rated 3.7 to 3.6. The Cudy GS1028PS2 28-Port Smart PoE+ leads on value, extras and poE budget. The Cudy GS1028PS2 28-Port Smart PoE+ costs $20 less ($179.99 vs $199.99).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Cudy GS1028PS2 28-Port Smart PoE+ vs TP-Link TL-SG1428PE 24-Port Smart PoE+

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every 200 W and up poe switch; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightCudy GS1028PS2 28-Port Smart PoE+TP-Link TL-SG1428PE 24-Port Smart PoE+
Overall rating3.7/53.6/5
Value 28%81 $0.60 per PoE watt ($179.99, 300 W)68 $0.80 per PoE watt ($199.99, 250 W)
PoE budget 20%86 300 W total PoE budget77 250 W total PoE budget
Ports & speeds 17%54 24 PoE ports at GbE, up to 30 W per port, 2 x 1G SFP54 24 PoE ports at GbE, up to 30 W per port, 2 x 1G SFP
Management 18%50 smart managed50 smart managed
Extras 7%55 rack-mountable, PoE auto recovery, 250 m extend mode25 PoE auto recovery
Warranty 10%0 warranty not published, scored as none50 3-year warranty

Specifications

Cudy GS1028PS2 28-Port Smart PoE+TP-Link TL-SG1428PE 24-Port Smart PoE+
Power over Ethernet
Total PoE budget300 W250 W
PoE ports24 of 2824 of 28
PoE standard802.3af/at (PoE+)802.3af/at (PoE+)
Max per port30 W30 W
PoE auto recoveryYesYes
250 m extend modeYes-
Ports & performance
Total ports2828
PoE port speedGbEGbE
SFP uplinks2 x 1G SFP2 x 1G SFP
Switching capacity56 Gbps-
Management
Management levelSmart managedSmart managed
VLANYesYes
QoS-Yes
Build
FanlessNo-
Rack-mountableYes-
Warranty-3 years

All poe switch comparisons →