EKway ABQL-8218 3-Flavor Vertical vs VEVOR YKF-8218T 3-Flavor Countertop

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The EKway ABQL-8218 3-Flavor Vertical rates 3.6 among floor-standing soft serve machines; the VEVOR YKF-8218T 3-Flavor Countertop rates 3.6 among countertop ones. The VEVOR YKF-8218T 3-Flavor Countertop costs $79.59 less ($1,269.90 vs $1,349.49).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

EKway ABQL-8218 3-Flavor Vertical vs VEVOR YKF-8218T 3-Flavor Countertop

Scores side by side

These two sit in different cabinet classes (floor-standing and countertop), and each is scored against the reference points for its own class, so a rating says how well each does among its own cabinet peers. How we rank explains each factor.

Factor weightEKway ABQL-8218 3-Flavor VerticalVEVOR YKF-8218T 3-Flavor Countertop
Overall rating3.6/53.6/5
Value 30%82 $48.20 per qt/hr ($1,349.49, 28 qt/hr)86 $42.90 per qt/hr ($1,269.90, 29.6 qt/hr)
Output 25%60 28 qt (26.5 L) an hour63 29.6 qt (28 L) an hour
Flavors 10%50 3 flavors (2+1)50 3 flavors (2+1)
Hopper capacity 10%40 12 L of hopper (2 x 6 L)40 12 L of hopper (2 x 6 L)
Features 15%60 hopper pre-cooling, low-mix alarm, auto-clean cycle60 hopper pre-cooling, auto-clean cycle, hopper agitator
Warranty 10%30 1-year parts warranty0 warranty not published, scored as none

Specifications

EKway ABQL-8218 3-Flavor VerticalVEVOR YKF-8218T 3-Flavor Countertop
Production
Output28 qt/hr (26.5 L/hr)29.6 qt/hr (28 L/hr)
Flavors3 (2+1)3 (2+1)
Mix hoppers2 x 6 L2 x 6 L
Freezing cylinders2 x 2 L-
Compressors21
Features
Hopper pre-coolingYesYes
Air pump or overrun systemNoNo
Low-mix alarmYesNo
Auto-clean cycleYesYes
Hopper agitatorNoYes
CastersYesNo
Electrical
Power2,450 W2,200 W
Build
CabinetFloor-standingCountertop
Parts warranty1 year-

All soft serve machine comparisons →