FSKEKU YKF-9228 3-Flavor Floor vs Garvee 3-Flavor Countertop 22-30 L/H

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The Garvee 3-Flavor Countertop 22-30 L/H rates 3.5 among countertop soft serve machines; the FSKEKU YKF-9228 3-Flavor Floor rates 3.3 among floor-standing ones. The Garvee 3-Flavor Countertop 22-30 L/H costs $300 less ($1,099.99 vs $1,399.99).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

FSKEKU YKF-9228 3-Flavor Floor vs Garvee 3-Flavor Countertop 22-30 L/H

Scores side by side

These two sit in different cabinet classes (countertop and floor-standing), and each is scored against the reference points for its own class, so a rating says how well each does among its own cabinet peers. How we rank explains each factor.

Factor weightGarvee 3-Flavor Countertop 22-30 L/HFSKEKU YKF-9228 3-Flavor Floor
Overall rating3.5/53.3/5
Value 30%94 $34.70 per qt/hr ($1,099.99, 31.7 qt/hr)85 $44.16 per qt/hr ($1,399.99, 31.7 qt/hr)
Output 25%66 31.7 qt (30 L) an hour66 31.7 qt (30 L) an hour
Flavors 10%50 3 flavors (2+1)50 3 flavors (2+1)
Hopper capacity 10%40 12 L of hopper (2 x 6 L)40 12 L of hopper (2 x 6 L)
Features 15%30 hopper pre-cooling0 none of the listed features
Warranty 10%0 warranty not published, scored as none0 warranty not published, scored as none

Specifications

Garvee 3-Flavor Countertop 22-30 L/HFSKEKU YKF-9228 3-Flavor Floor
Production
Output31.7 qt/hr (30 L/hr)31.7 qt/hr (30 L/hr)
Flavors3 (2+1)3 (2+1)
Mix hoppers2 x 6 L2 x 6 L
Freezing cylinders2 x 2 L2 x 1.7 L
Compressors11
Features
Hopper pre-coolingYesNo
Air pump or overrun systemNoNo
Low-mix alarmNoNo
Auto-clean cycleNoNo
Hopper agitatorNoNo
CastersNoNo
Electrical
Power1,800 W2,200 W
Voltage-115 V
Build
CabinetCountertopFloor-standing
Dimensions (W x D x H)24.8 x 30.7 x 41.3 in21.3 x 26.6 x 53.5 in

All soft serve machine comparisons →