Lewmar 140TT 2.0 kW Tunnel Thruster vs Vetus BOW3512E Bow Thruster 35 kgf

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The Vetus BOW3512E Bow Thruster 35 kgf is the better bow thruster overall, rated 3.8 to 3.5. The Vetus BOW3512E Bow Thruster 35 kgf leads on efficiency. The Lewmar 140TT 2.0 kW Tunnel Thruster wins on value. The Lewmar 140TT 2.0 kW Tunnel Thruster costs $172.30 less ($1,613.74 vs $1,786.04).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Lewmar 140TT 2.0 kW Tunnel Thruster vs Vetus BOW3512E Bow Thruster 35 kgf

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every under 45 kgf bow thruster; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightVetus BOW3512E Bow Thruster 35 kgfLewmar 140TT 2.0 kW Tunnel Thruster
Overall rating3.8/53.5/5
Value 40%52 $51.03 per kgf ($1,786.04, 35 kgf)62 $43.61 per kgf ($1,613.74, 37 kgf)
Efficiency 25%100 23.3 kgf per kW (35 kgf, 1.5 kW)64 18.5 kgf per kW (37 kgf, 2 kW)
Run time 25%67 4 minutes continuous50 run time not published (neutral score used)
Weight 10%31 2.9 kgf per kg (35 kgf, 12 kg)28 2.8 kgf per kg (37 kgf, 13 kg)

Specifications

Vetus BOW3512E Bow Thruster 35 kgfLewmar 140TT 2.0 kW Tunnel Thruster
Thrust
Rated thrust35 kgf37 kgf
StyleTunnelTunnel
PropellersSingleSingle
Bow or stern useYes-
Boat length20-30 ft-
Electrical
Supply12 V12 V
Motor1.5 kW2 kW
Current draw220 A-
Continuous run4 min-
Build
Tunnel diameter150 mm140 mm
Weight12 kg (26 lb)13 kg (29 lb)

All bow thruster comparisons →