Pantin PT-30313 100-Cup Rice Warmer vs Town 56919 92-Cup Rice Warmer

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The Town 56919 92-Cup Rice Warmer is the better commercial rice cooker overall, rated 4.0 to 3.9. The Town 56919 92-Cup Rice Warmer leads on features and heating. The Pantin PT-30313 100-Cup Rice Warmer wins on value and capacity. The Pantin PT-30313 100-Cup Rice Warmer costs $135.35 less ($238 vs $373.35).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Pantin PT-30313 100-Cup Rice Warmer vs Town 56919 92-Cup Rice Warmer

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every rice warmers commercial rice cooker; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightTown 56919 92-Cup Rice WarmerPantin PT-30313 100-Cup Rice Warmer
Overall rating4.0/53.9/5
Value 25%57 $4.06 per cooked cup ($373.35, 92 cups)80 $2.38 per cooked cup ($238, 100 cups)
Capacity 15%74 92 cups cooked86 100 cups cooked
Heating 15%100 holds rice up to 12 hours67 holds rice up to 10 hours
Listings 20%100 listed NSF and ETL100 listed NSF and ETL
Features 15%70 hinged lid, insulated body, stainless body, keeps warm 8 hours or more30 stainless body, keeps warm 8 hours or more
Warranty 10%0 warranty not published, scored as none0 warranty not published, scored as none

Specifications

Town 56919 92-Cup Rice WarmerPantin PT-30313 100-Cup Rice Warmer
Capacity
TypeWarmer onlyWarmer only
Cooked capacity92 cups100 cups
Raw capacity-50 cups
Keep-warm time12 hours10 hours
Power
Wattage100 W95 W
Voltage120 V120 V
Listings
SanitationNSFNSF
SafetyETLETL
Features
Inner potuncoated aluminumnonstick
Hinged lidYes-
Insulated bodyYes-
Stainless bodyYesYes
Build
Weight-15 lb
Dimensions18 1/4 x 15 x 15 1/215.5 diameter x 17 H

All commercial rice cooker comparisons →