Proctor Silex 37580 Rice Warmer vs Town 56822 50-Cup Rice Cooker

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The Proctor Silex 37580 Rice Warmer rates 4.0 among rice warmers commercial rice cookers; the Town 56822 50-Cup Rice Cooker rates 2.8 among electric cookers ones. The Proctor Silex 37580 Rice Warmer costs $402.99 less ($149.99 vs $552.98).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Proctor Silex 37580 Rice Warmer vs Town 56822 50-Cup Rice Cooker

Scores side by side

These two sit in different type classes (rice warmers and electric cookers), and each is scored against the reference points for its own class, so a rating says how well each does among its own type peers. How we rank explains each factor.

Factor weightProctor Silex 37580 Rice WarmerTown 56822 50-Cup Rice Cooker
Overall rating4.0/52.8/5
Value 25%78 $2.50 per cooked cup ($149.99, 60 cups)13 $11.06 per cooked cup ($552.98, 50 cups)
Capacity 15%29 60 cups cooked14 50 cups cooked
Heating 15%100 holds rice up to 12 hours70 34 W per cooked cup (1,700 W)
Listings 20%100 listed ETL Sanitation and cETLus100 listed NSF and ETL
Features 15%80 hinged lid, insulated body, stainless body, keeps warm 8 hours or more, condensation collector10 safety cutoff
Warranty 10%0 warranty not published, scored as none0 warranty not published, scored as none

Specifications

Proctor Silex 37580 Rice WarmerTown 56822 50-Cup Rice Cooker
Capacity
TypeWarmer onlyElectric cooker
Cooked capacity60 cups50 cups
Raw capacity-25 cups
Keep-warm time12 hours-
Power
Wattage103 W1,700 W
Voltage120 V120 V
Listings
SanitationETL SanitationNSF
SafetycETLusETL
Features
Inner potnonstick-
Hinged lidYes-
Insulated bodyYes-
Stainless bodyYes-
Condensation collectorYes-
Safety cutoff-Yes
Build
Weight15.9 lb-
Dimensions-14.75 x 14.75 x 12

All commercial rice cooker comparisons →