ProTeam ProVac FS 6
#2 in CordedFull review
A light, proven 6 qt backpack for daily janitorial work, now succeeded by the GoFit 6.
Amazon $540.40$540.40
The ProTeam ProVac FS 6 is the better backpack vacuum overall, rated 4.1 to 3.5. The ProTeam ProVac FS 6 leads on airflow, capacity and noise. The Prolux XForce Pro costs $40.41 less ($499.99 vs $540.40).
Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Prolux XForce Pro
#10 in CordedFull review
A bagless backpack for users who would rather empty a bin than buy bags, on small to mid-size jobs.
Amazon $499.99$499.99
Which should you buy?
- Choose the ProTeam ProVac FS 6 for airflow (153 CFM vs 105 CFM), capacity (6 qt vs 2.4 qt) and noise (69.7 dBA vs 72 dBA).
Scores side by side
Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every corded backpack vacuum; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.
| Factor weight | ProTeam ProVac FS 6 | Prolux XForce Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.1/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Airflow 25% | 94 153 CFM | 50 105 CFM |
| Price 20% | 51 $540.40 | 55 $499.99 |
| Weight 15% | 76 11.6 lb | 82 11 lb |
| Reach 10% | 100 50 ft cord | 100 50 ft cord |
| Capacity 10% | 50 6 qt | 5 2.4 qt |
| Noise 10% | 41 69.7 dBA | 23 72 dBA |
| Warranty 10% | 100 3-year motor warranty | 100 3-year motor warranty |
Specifications
| ProTeam ProVac FS 6 | Prolux XForce Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Suction | ||
| Airflow | 153 CFM | 105 CFM |
| Water lift (not scored) | 91 in | - |
| Motor (not scored) | 1,108 W | - |
| Collection | ||
| Capacity | 6 qt | 2.4 qt |
| Bagless | No | Yes |
| Filtration | 4-stage | HEPA |
| Power | ||
| Power | Corded | Corded |
| Cord length | 50 ft | 50 ft |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 11.6 lb | 11 lb |
| Noise | 69.7 dBA | 72 dBA |
| Warranty (motor) | 3 years | 3 years |