Sleipner SE130 Tunnel Thruster 12V vs Vetus BOW9524D Bow Thruster 105 kgf

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The Sleipner SE130 Tunnel Thruster 12V is the better bow thruster overall, rated 3.9 to 3.7. The Sleipner SE130 Tunnel Thruster 12V leads on efficiency and value. The Vetus BOW9524D Bow Thruster 105 kgf wins on run time. The Vetus BOW9524D Bow Thruster 105 kgf costs $111.98 less ($3,901.41 vs $4,013.39).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Sleipner SE130 Tunnel Thruster 12V vs Vetus BOW9524D Bow Thruster 105 kgf

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every over 75 kgf bow thruster; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightSleipner SE130 Tunnel Thruster 12VVetus BOW9524D Bow Thruster 105 kgf
Overall rating3.9/53.7/5
Value 40%86 $30.87 per kgf ($4,013.39, 130 kgf)73 $37.16 per kgf ($3,901.41, 105 kgf)
Efficiency 25%86 20 kgf per kW (130 kgf, 6.5 kW)63 18.4 kgf per kW (105 kgf, 5.7 kW)
Run time 25%33 3 minutes continuous50 3.5 minutes continuous
Weight 10%50 3.5 kgf per kg (130 kgf, 37 kg)50 3.5 kgf per kg (105 kgf, 30 kg)

Specifications

Sleipner SE130 Tunnel Thruster 12VVetus BOW9524D Bow Thruster 105 kgf
Thrust
Rated thrust130 kgf105 kgf
Thrust at full supply voltage160 kgf-
StyleTunnelTunnel
PropellersTwinSingle
Bow or stern useYesYes
Boat length43-62 ft36-55 ft
Electrical
Supply12 V24 V
Motor6.5 kW5.7 kW
Current draw800 A320 A
Continuous run3 min3.5 min
Build
Tunnel diameter250 mm185 mm
Weight37 kg (81.6 lb)30 kg (66 lb)

All bow thruster comparisons →