True T-23-HC vs True T-23F-HC

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The True T-23-HC rates 3.8 among reach-in refrigerators commercial refrigerators; the True T-23F-HC rates 3.5 among reach-in freezers ones. The True T-23-HC costs $1,001.79 less ($4,017.45 vs $5,019.24).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

True T-23-HC vs True T-23F-HC

Scores side by side

These two sit in different type classes (reach-in refrigerators and reach-in freezers), and each is scored against the reference points for its own class, so a rating says how well each does among its own type peers. How we rank explains each factor.

Factor weightTrue T-23-HCTrue T-23F-HC
Overall rating3.8/53.5/5
Value 35%17 5 cu ft per $1,000 (20.3 cu ft (ENERGY STAR volume), $4,017.45)14 3.7 cu ft per $1,000 (18.5 cu ft (ENERGY STAR volume), $5,019.24)
Efficiency 20%68 1.2 kWh a day, 0.059 kWh per cu ft39 4.27 kWh a day, 0.230 kWh per cu ft
Certifications 20%100 sanitation listed, ENERGY STAR certified100 sanitation listed, ENERGY STAR certified
Warranty 25%100 7-year parts and labor, 7-year compressor100 7-year parts and labor, 7-year compressor

Specifications

True T-23-HCTrue T-23F-HC
Storage
Capacity20.3 cu ft18.5 cu ft
Capacity sourceENERGY STAR certified volumeENERGY STAR certified volume
Doors1 solid door1 solid door
Shelves33
Size (W × D × H)27 × 29.5 × 78.4 in27 × 29.5 × 78.4 in
CastersYes, 4 inYes, 4 in
Refrigeration
Temperature range33 to 38°F-10°F
RefrigerantR290R290
Compressor1/4 HP1/2 HP
Compressor locationBottomBottom
Electrical115/60/1115/60/1
Current2.2 A3.2 A
Energy use1.2 kWh/day4.27 kWh/day
Certifications and warranty
Sanitation listingNSF-7NSF-7
ENERGY STARYesYes
Parts warranty7 years7 years
Labor warranty7 years7 years
Compressor warranty7 years7 years
Released2015-08-10-

All commercial refrigerator comparisons →