xTool Apparel Printer Plus vs xTool Apparel Printer Plus Shaker Kit

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The xTool Apparel Printer Plus Shaker Kit rates 3.4 among shaker kits DTF printers; the xTool Apparel Printer Plus rates 3.3 among A3 (13 to 14 in) ones. The xTool Apparel Printer Plus costs $2,500 less ($4,899 vs $7,399).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

xTool Apparel Printer Plus vs xTool Apparel Printer Plus Shaker Kit

Scores side by side

These two sit in different format classes (shaker kits and A3 (13 to 14 in)), and each is scored against the reference points for its own class, so a rating says how well each does among its own format peers. How we rank explains each factor.

Factor weightxTool Apparel Printer Plus Shaker KitxTool Apparel Printer Plus
Overall rating3.4/53.3/5
Value 30%0 $528.50 per inch of width ($7,399, 14 in)19 $349.93 per inch of width ($4,899, 14 in)
Printhead 25%100 dual Epson i1600 (industrial)100 dual Epson i1600 (industrial)
Print width 10%38 14 in print width38 14 in print width
Features 25%85 white ink circulation, automatic cleaning, oven or shaker included, software included, film cutter55 white ink circulation, automatic cleaning, software included
Warranty 10%43 1-year machine warranty43 1-year machine warranty

Specifications

xTool Apparel Printer Plus Shaker KitxTool Apparel Printer Plus
Printing
Film formatA3A3
Print width14 in14 in
Printhead2 x Epson i16002 x Epson i1600
Head classIndustrialIndustrial
Max resolution720 x 1800720 x 1800
A3 print time (maker)1.5 min1.5 min
Output (maker)50 sq ft/h50 sq ft/h
Features
White ink circulationYesYes
Automatic cleaningYesYes
Film cutterYes-
Software includedYesYes
Curing oven includedNoNo
Powder shaker includedYesNo
Build
Weight-71.7 lb
Machine warranty1 year1 year

All DTF printer comparisons →