Korad KEL2010 vs OWON OEL1530

Last updated: November 9, 2026

The Korad KEL2010 and the OWON OEL1530 are evenly matched, rated 3.5 and 3.4. The Korad KEL2010 leads on output quality, resolution and protection & features. The OWON OEL1530 wins on value and PC control. The OWON OEL1530 costs $309.01 less ($215.99 vs $525).

Prices were last checked November 9, 2026. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon or the retailer's site at the time of purchase apply. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Korad KEL2010 vs OWON OEL1530

Which should you buy?

Scores side by side

Each factor is scored 0-100 against the same fixed reference points for every electronic loads bench power supply; a clear win is highlighted. How we rank explains each one.

Factor weightKorad KEL2010OWON OEL1530
Overall rating3.5/53.4/5
Value 25%30 $1.75 per watt ($525, 300 W rated)55 $0.72 per watt ($215.99, 300 W rated)
Output quality 20%68 10 kHz dynamic mode47 5 kHz dynamic mode
Resolution 15%100 0.1 mV / 0.1 mA setting resolution75 1 mV / 1 mA setting resolution
PC control 15%70 USB, RS232, LAN80 USB, RS232 with SCPI
Protection & features 10%100 over-voltage protection, over-current protection, remote sense, stored setups80 over-voltage protection, over-current protection, remote sense
Warranty 15%0 warranty not published, scored as none0 warranty not published, scored as none

Specifications

Korad KEL2010OWON OEL1530
Output
TypeElectronic loadElectronic load
Channels11
Channel ratings150 V/40 A, 300 W150 V/30 A, 300 W
Max voltage150 V150 V
Max current40 A30 A
Rated power300 W300 W
Dynamic mode10 kHz5 kHz
Load modesCC, CV, CR, CPCC, CV, CR, CP
Precision
Setting resolution0.1 mV / 0.1 mA1 mV / 1 mA
Readback resolution0.1 mV / 0.1 mA1 mV / 0.1 mA
Remote senseYesYes
Control
PC interfacesUSB, RS232, LANUSB, RS232
SCPI-Yes
Stored setups100-
Over-voltage protectionYesYes
Over-current protectionYesYes
Build
Weight-5.5 lb

All bench power supply comparisons →